#16: implement DKIM key provisioning, Ed25519 & RSA dual signatures and rotation

This commit is contained in:
Lucas Rayan committed 2026-08-01 22:48:15 -03:00
1 parent 68799acea0
commit b96be4a2a5
8 files changed
+792

No files matched your search

@@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
package usecase
import (
"context"
"fmt"
)
// DkimKeyProvisioner is the storage side of key provisioning. It is declared
// here, next to its consumer, rather than in the shared port package because
// only this use case needs the write path.
type DkimKeyProvisioner interface {
FindPublicKey(ctx context.Context, domainName, algorithm string) (string, error)
Insert(ctx context.Context, domainName, selector, algorithm string, privateKeyPEM []byte, publicKey string) error
}
// DkimKeyGenerator produces a fresh key pair for an algorithm.
type DkimKeyGenerator func(algorithm string) (privateKeyPEM []byte, publicKeyBase64 string, err error)
// Selectors match the names published by the DNS reconciler
// (PLAN.md section 7.1, records 5 and 6).
const (
RsaDkimSelector = "default"
Ed25519DkimSelector = "default-ed"
rsaAlgorithm = "rsa2048"
ed25519Algorithm = "ed25519"
)
// ProvisionDkimKeysOutput carries the published halves, which the DNS
// reconciler needs to build the TXT records.
type ProvisionDkimKeysOutput struct {
RsaPublicKey string
Ed25519PublicKey string
Created []string
}
// ProvisionDkimKeysUseCase makes sure a domain has one active key per
// algorithm before it is asked to sign anything. It is idempotent: running it
// on a domain that already has keys returns the existing public halves and
// creates nothing.
type ProvisionDkimKeysUseCase struct {
keys DkimKeyProvisioner
generate DkimKeyGenerator
}
func NewProvisionDkimKeysUseCase(keys DkimKeyProvisioner, generate DkimKeyGenerator) *ProvisionDkimKeysUseCase {
return &ProvisionDkimKeysUseCase{keys: keys, generate: generate}
}
func (uc *ProvisionDkimKeysUseCase) Execute(ctx context.Context, domainName string) (*ProvisionDkimKeysOutput, error) {
if domainName == "" {
return nil, fmt.Errorf("provision dkim keys: domain name is required")
}
out := &ProvisionDkimKeysOutput{}
rsaKey, err := uc.ensure(ctx, domainName, rsaAlgorithm, RsaDkimSelector, out)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
out.RsaPublicKey = rsaKey
edKey, err := uc.ensure(ctx, domainName, ed25519Algorithm, Ed25519DkimSelector, out)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
out.Ed25519PublicKey = edKey
return out, nil
}
func (uc *ProvisionDkimKeysUseCase) ensure(ctx context.Context, domainName, algorithm, selector string, out *ProvisionDkimKeysOutput) (string, error) {
existing, err := uc.keys.FindPublicKey(ctx, domainName, algorithm)
if err != nil {
return "", fmt.Errorf("look up %s key for %s: %w", algorithm, domainName, err)
}
if existing != "" {
return existing, nil
}
privateKeyPEM, publicKey, err := uc.generate(algorithm)
if err != nil {
return "", fmt.Errorf("generate %s key for %s: %w", algorithm, domainName, err)
}
if err := uc.keys.Insert(ctx, domainName, selector, algorithm, privateKeyPEM, publicKey); err != nil {
return "", fmt.Errorf("store %s key for %s: %w", algorithm, domainName, err)
}
// Re-read rather than trusting the generated value: a concurrent
// provisioner may have won the insert, and the DNS record has to carry
// whichever key actually became active.
stored, err := uc.keys.FindPublicKey(ctx, domainName, algorithm)
if err != nil {
return "", fmt.Errorf("confirm %s key for %s: %w", algorithm, domainName, err)
}
out.Created = append(out.Created, algorithm)
return stored, nil
}