Files
LambdaMail/services/protocols/internal/domain/sieve/sieve_test.go
T
Lucas RayanandClaude Opus 5 b9ebf606e1 feat(sieve): motor que avalia as regras na entrega
Primeira metade do que falta para a ausência e os filtros funcionarem:
o motor em si, como domínio puro e testável, ainda sem estar ligado à
entrega.

É um subconjunto deliberado do RFC 5228 mais o vacation do RFC 5230:
os testes e as ações que a interface gera e que um script escrito à
mão provavelmente usa - header com :is, :contains e :matches, anyof,
allof, not, if/elsif/else, fileinto, discard, addflag, keep, stop e
vacation. O que não entende é recusado em vez de ignorado: uma regra
que o utilizador escreveu e que silenciosamente não faz nada é pior do
que uma que diz que não consegue correr.

:matches é correspondência com curingas, não expressão regular. Em
Sieve todos os outros caracteres são literais, portanto "a.b@x.test"
tem de casar apenas com um ponto verdadeiro; compilá-lo como regex
faria casar também "axb@x.test" e entregaria a um autor de scripts toda
a gramática das expressões regulares, incluindo padrões que levam tempo
exponencial numa linha de assunto construída para isso. O algoritmo faz
backtracking iterativo, linear no caso comum, e há um teste com limite
de tempo que falha se voltar a ser exponencial.

A parte da ausência que realmente importa é quando não responder. O
RFC 3834 é a regra: responde-se à mensagem de uma pessoa e a mais nada.
Remetente de envelope vazio, auto-submitted, precedence bulk, qualquer
cabeçalho de lista, x-auto-response-suppress, endereços reservados como
mailer-daemon, e a própria caixa - nenhum recebe resposta. É assim que
uma caixa evita responder a uma lista à frente de toda a gente, ou
entrar num ciclo com outro respondedor automático.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-22 13:24:20 -03:00

358 lines
13 KiB
Go

package sieve
import (
"strings"
"testing"
"time"
)
// The rules a mailbox owner writes, actually applied to the mail that arrives.
//
// Until now nothing ran them. ManageSieve stored scripts, the settings screen
// wrote them, and every message was delivered as though no rule existed - so a
// vacation responder that was switched on never replied, and a filter that
// said "file this in Faturas" never filed anything anywhere.
func evaluate(t *testing.T, script string, msg Message) Outcome {
t.Helper()
parsed, err := Parse(script)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("parse: %v\nscript:\n%s", err, script)
}
return Evaluate(parsed, msg)
}
// The exact shape the settings screen writes.
const uiRule = `if header :contains "Subject" "Fatura" { fileinto "Faturas"; }`
func TestRuleFilesTheMessageInItsFolder(t *testing.T) {
out := evaluate(t, uiRule, Message{Headers: map[string][]string{
"subject": {"Fatura de agosto"},
}})
if out.Folder != "Faturas" {
t.Errorf("filed into %q, want Faturas", out.Folder)
}
if out.Discard {
t.Error("the message was discarded")
}
}
func TestRuleThatDoesNotMatchLeavesTheMessageAlone(t *testing.T) {
out := evaluate(t, uiRule, Message{Headers: map[string][]string{
"subject": {"Almoço amanhã"},
}})
if out.Folder != "" {
t.Errorf("an unmatched rule filed into %q", out.Folder)
}
}
// Header matching is case-insensitive on the name, per RFC 5228: a header is
// "Subject" or "subject" depending on who sent the mail.
func TestHeaderNameIsCaseInsensitive(t *testing.T) {
out := evaluate(t, `if header :contains "SUBJECT" "fatura" { fileinto "Faturas"; }`,
Message{Headers: map[string][]string{"subject": {"Fatura de agosto"}}})
if out.Folder != "Faturas" {
t.Errorf("folder %q", out.Folder)
}
}
func TestContainsIsCaseInsensitiveOnTheValue(t *testing.T) {
out := evaluate(t, uiRule, Message{Headers: map[string][]string{
"subject": {"FATURA DE AGOSTO"},
}})
if out.Folder != "Faturas" {
t.Errorf("folder %q; :contains should not depend on case", out.Folder)
}
}
func TestIsRequiresTheWholeValue(t *testing.T) {
script := `if header :is "Subject" "Fatura" { fileinto "Faturas"; }`
if out := evaluate(t, script, Message{Headers: map[string][]string{"subject": {"Fatura"}}}); out.Folder != "Faturas" {
t.Errorf("exact match failed: %q", out.Folder)
}
if out := evaluate(t, script, Message{Headers: map[string][]string{"subject": {"Fatura de agosto"}}}); out.Folder != "" {
t.Errorf(":is matched a longer value: %q", out.Folder)
}
}
// :matches is Sieve's wildcard form - * and ? - and is what the interface
// should offer instead of asking a human for a regular expression.
func TestMatchesUsesWildcardsNotRegex(t *testing.T) {
script := `if header :matches "From" "*@google.com" { fileinto "Relatórios"; }`
if out := evaluate(t, script, Message{Headers: map[string][]string{
"from": {"noreply-dmarc-support@google.com"},
}}); out.Folder != "Relatórios" {
t.Errorf("wildcard did not match: %q", out.Folder)
}
if out := evaluate(t, script, Message{Headers: map[string][]string{
"from": {"someone@example.test"},
}}); out.Folder != "" {
t.Errorf("wildcard matched the wrong sender: %q", out.Folder)
}
}
// A wildcard pattern must not be read as a regular expression: "." is a
// literal dot in Sieve, and treating it as "any character" would file mail
// the reader never asked to file.
func TestWildcardDotIsLiteral(t *testing.T) {
out := evaluate(t, `if header :matches "From" "a.b@example.test" { fileinto "X"; }`,
Message{Headers: map[string][]string{"from": {"axb@example.test"}}})
if out.Folder != "" {
t.Errorf("the dot was treated as a regex wildcard: %q", out.Folder)
}
}
func TestAnyofMatchesWhenOneTestPasses(t *testing.T) {
script := `if anyof (header :contains "Subject" "fatura", header :contains "From" "banco") { fileinto "Financeiro"; }`
out := evaluate(t, script, Message{Headers: map[string][]string{
"subject": {"Almoço"}, "from": {"aviso@banco.test"},
}})
if out.Folder != "Financeiro" {
t.Errorf("anyof did not match: %q", out.Folder)
}
}
func TestAllofRequiresEveryTest(t *testing.T) {
script := `if allof (header :contains "Subject" "fatura", header :contains "From" "banco") { fileinto "Financeiro"; }`
if out := evaluate(t, script, Message{Headers: map[string][]string{
"subject": {"Fatura"}, "from": {"aviso@banco.test"},
}}); out.Folder != "Financeiro" {
t.Errorf("allof with both matching: %q", out.Folder)
}
if out := evaluate(t, script, Message{Headers: map[string][]string{
"subject": {"Fatura"}, "from": {"amigo@example.test"},
}}); out.Folder != "" {
t.Errorf("allof matched with only one test true: %q", out.Folder)
}
}
func TestElsifAndElse(t *testing.T) {
script := `
if header :contains "Subject" "fatura" { fileinto "Financeiro"; }
elsif header :contains "Subject" "convite" { fileinto "Eventos"; }
else { fileinto "Outros"; }`
cases := map[string]string{
"Fatura de agosto": "Financeiro",
"Convite de festa": "Eventos",
"Qualquer coisa": "Outros",
}
for subject, want := range cases {
out := evaluate(t, script, Message{Headers: map[string][]string{"subject": {subject}}})
if out.Folder != want {
t.Errorf("%q filed into %q, want %q", subject, out.Folder, want)
}
}
}
// The first rule that files the message wins, so two rules cannot disagree
// about where one message ends up.
func TestFirstMatchingRuleDecidesTheFolder(t *testing.T) {
script := `
if header :contains "Subject" "fatura" { fileinto "Financeiro"; }
if header :contains "Subject" "agosto" { fileinto "Arquivo"; }`
out := evaluate(t, script, Message{Headers: map[string][]string{"subject": {"Fatura de agosto"}}})
if out.Folder != "Financeiro" {
t.Errorf("folder %q, want the first rule's Financeiro", out.Folder)
}
}
func TestStopEndsEvaluation(t *testing.T) {
script := `
if header :contains "Subject" "fatura" { fileinto "Financeiro"; stop; }
if header :contains "Subject" "agosto" { discard; }`
out := evaluate(t, script, Message{Headers: map[string][]string{"subject": {"Fatura de agosto"}}})
if out.Discard {
t.Error("evaluation continued past stop and discarded the message")
}
}
func TestDiscardIsHonoured(t *testing.T) {
out := evaluate(t, `if header :contains "Subject" "spam" { discard; }`,
Message{Headers: map[string][]string{"subject": {"spam barato"}}})
if !out.Discard {
t.Error("discard was ignored")
}
}
func TestAddflagMarksTheMessage(t *testing.T) {
out := evaluate(t, `if header :contains "From" "chefe" { addflag "\\Flagged"; }`,
Message{Headers: map[string][]string{"from": {"chefe@example.test"}}})
if len(out.Flags) != 1 || out.Flags[0] != `\Flagged` {
t.Errorf("flags %v", out.Flags)
}
}
// --- vacation ------------------------------------------------------------
const vacationScript = `require ["vacation"];
vacation :subject "Fora do escritório" "Estou de férias até dia 30.";`
func TestVacationProducesAReply(t *testing.T) {
out := evaluate(t, vacationScript, Message{
Headers: map[string][]string{"from": {"amigo@example.test"}, "subject": {"Oi"}},
Sender: "amigo@example.test",
})
if out.Vacation == nil {
t.Fatal("no vacation reply was produced")
}
if out.Vacation.Subject != "Fora do escritório" {
t.Errorf("subject %q", out.Vacation.Subject)
}
if !strings.Contains(out.Vacation.Body, "férias") {
t.Errorf("body %q", out.Vacation.Body)
}
}
// A vacation reply to a mailing list, a bounce or another autoresponder is how
// two servers end up replying to each other forever. RFC 3834 says an
// automatic reply goes only to a real person's message.
func TestVacationStaysSilentForAutomatedMail(t *testing.T) {
quiet := []Message{
{Sender: "", Headers: map[string][]string{}}, // bounce: empty envelope sender
{Sender: "a@b.test", Headers: map[string][]string{"auto-submitted": {"auto-replied"}}},
{Sender: "a@b.test", Headers: map[string][]string{"precedence": {"bulk"}}},
{Sender: "a@b.test", Headers: map[string][]string{"list-id": {"<list.example.test>"}}},
{Sender: "a@b.test", Headers: map[string][]string{"x-auto-response-suppress": {"All"}}},
{Sender: "MAILER-DAEMON@b.test", Headers: map[string][]string{}},
}
for i, msg := range quiet {
if out := evaluate(t, vacationScript, msg); out.Vacation != nil {
t.Errorf("case %d: replied to automated mail", i)
}
}
}
func TestVacationDoesNotReplyToYourself(t *testing.T) {
out := evaluate(t, vacationScript, Message{
Sender: "me@example.test",
Recipient: "me@example.test",
Headers: map[string][]string{"from": {"me@example.test"}},
})
if out.Vacation != nil {
t.Error("the responder replied to the mailbox's own message")
}
}
// --- robustness ----------------------------------------------------------
// A script this parser cannot read must not stop the mail. Delivery is the
// thing that matters; a rule that does not run is a lesser failure than a
// message that never arrives.
func TestUnparseableScriptIsReportedNotFatal(t *testing.T) {
if _, err := Parse(`if header :contains "Subject" {{{`); err == nil {
t.Error("a malformed script should be reported as an error")
}
}
func TestEmptyScriptDoesNothing(t *testing.T) {
out := evaluate(t, "", Message{Headers: map[string][]string{"subject": {"x"}}})
if out.Folder != "" || out.Discard || out.Vacation != nil {
t.Errorf("an empty script did something: %+v", out)
}
}
func TestCommentsAndBlankLinesAreIgnored(t *testing.T) {
script := `
# uma regra qualquer
if header :contains "Subject" "fatura" { fileinto "Financeiro"; } # fim
`
out := evaluate(t, script, Message{Headers: map[string][]string{"subject": {"Fatura"}}})
if out.Folder != "Financeiro" {
t.Errorf("folder %q", out.Folder)
}
}
// A folder name is used to route mail, so it must survive intact - including
// the accents a Portuguese folder name has.
func TestFolderNamesKeepTheirAccents(t *testing.T) {
out := evaluate(t, `if header :contains "Subject" "x" { fileinto "Relatórios"; }`,
Message{Headers: map[string][]string{"subject": {"x"}}})
if out.Folder != "Relatórios" {
t.Errorf("folder %q", out.Folder)
}
}
// A script with thousands of rules must not become a way to stall delivery.
func TestEvaluationIsBounded(t *testing.T) {
var b strings.Builder
for i := 0; i < 5000; i++ {
b.WriteString(`if header :contains "Subject" "nada" { fileinto "X"; }` + "\n")
}
if _, err := Parse(b.String()); err == nil {
t.Error("an unreasonably large script should be refused rather than evaluated")
}
}
// :matches is anchored: the pattern describes the whole value, not a piece of
// it. Without that, ":matches" would behave like ":contains" and a rule
// written to catch one exact address would quietly catch every address that
// contained it.
func TestMatchesIsAnchoredNotASubstring(t *testing.T) {
script := `if header :matches "Subject" "fatura" { fileinto "X"; }`
if out := evaluate(t, script, Message{Headers: map[string][]string{
"subject": {"fatura"},
}}); out.Folder != "X" {
t.Errorf("the exact value did not match: %q", out.Folder)
}
if out := evaluate(t, script, Message{Headers: map[string][]string{
"subject": {"minha fatura de agosto"},
}}); out.Folder != "" {
t.Errorf(":matches behaved like :contains: %q", out.Folder)
}
}
// ? is exactly one character, which nothing else in the grammar provides.
func TestMatchesSingleCharacterWildcard(t *testing.T) {
script := `if header :matches "Subject" "fatura-?" { fileinto "X"; }`
if out := evaluate(t, script, Message{Headers: map[string][]string{
"subject": {"fatura-1"},
}}); out.Folder != "X" {
t.Errorf("? did not match one character: %q", out.Folder)
}
if out := evaluate(t, script, Message{Headers: map[string][]string{
"subject": {"fatura-12"},
}}); out.Folder != "" {
t.Errorf("? matched two characters: %q", out.Folder)
}
if out := evaluate(t, script, Message{Headers: map[string][]string{
"subject": {"fatura-"},
}}); out.Folder != "" {
t.Errorf("? matched no character at all: %q", out.Folder)
}
}
// A star in the middle has to match the run between two fixed parts.
func TestMatchesStarInTheMiddle(t *testing.T) {
script := `if header :matches "Subject" "Relatório * de agosto" { fileinto "X"; }`
if out := evaluate(t, script, Message{Headers: map[string][]string{
"subject": {"Relatório mensal de agosto"},
}}); out.Folder != "X" {
t.Errorf("star in the middle did not match: %q", out.Folder)
}
if out := evaluate(t, script, Message{Headers: map[string][]string{
"subject": {"Relatório mensal de julho"},
}}); out.Folder != "" {
t.Errorf("matched despite a different tail: %q", out.Folder)
}
}
// A pattern of stars against a long value is where a naive matcher goes
// exponential. It must stay fast.
func TestMatchesDoesNotBlowUpOnManyStars(t *testing.T) {
value := strings.Repeat("a", 3000) + "b"
script := `if header :matches "Subject" "` + strings.Repeat("*a", 20) + `*c" { fileinto "X"; }`
done := make(chan Outcome, 1)
go func() {
done <- evaluate(t, script, Message{Headers: map[string][]string{"subject": {value}}})
}()
select {
case out := <-done:
if out.Folder != "" {
t.Errorf("matched what it should not: %q", out.Folder)
}
case <-time.After(3 * time.Second):
t.Fatal("wildcard matching took more than three seconds; it is backtracking exponentially")
}
}