fix(dns): o painel dizia que faltavam registos que estavam publicados

Tres defeitos na comparacao, todos encontrados contra a zona real. Cada
um fazia a consola declarar em falta um registo que existia e estava a
funcionar - o que e pior do que nao dizer nada, porque manda o operador
procurar um problema que nao ha.

MX. A especificacao guarda a prioridade num campo proprio, portanto o
valor desejado e so o host. A comparacao era feita contra "10 mail.x."
como texto, e por isso o MX de um dominio que recebe correio todos os
dias aparecia como inexistente.

TXT longo. Um valor acima de 255 bytes e publicado em varias strings, e
o resolver devolve-as entre aspas. Tirar as aspas e juntar tudo com
espacos punha um espaco no meio de uma chave DKIM: todos os registos
DKIM RSA da zona eram dados como em falta. As strings sao agora unidas
ponta a ponta, e os espacos dentro de cada uma sobrevivem.

Registos atras do proxy. Um CNAME proxied nao e publicado como CNAME -
o proxy responde A. Perguntar pelo CNAME devolvia resposta vazia, e o
registo era dado como em falta apesar de estar la a servir trafego. A
pergunta passa a ser do tipo que o proxy responde de facto.

A comparacao passa a ser por tipo em vez de uma normalizacao unica para
tudo, que era a origem comum dos tres.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

services/protocols/internal/infrastructure/netdns/public_verifier.go

@@ -50,6 +50,12 @@ func (v *PublicVerifier) VerifyRecord(ctx context.Context, record entity.DnsReco
 	// disagree. Presence is all that can be checked.
 	checkValue := !record.Proxied
 
+	// And it is not published as the type it was created as: a proxied CNAME
+	// answers A, so asking for the CNAME comes back empty and the record was
+	// reported as missing while it was there and serving traffic. For those,
+	// the question has to be the type the proxy actually answers.
+	qtype = dns.StringToType[queryTypeFor(record.Type, record.Proxied)]
+
 	var lastDetail string
 	for _, resolver := range v.resolvers {
 		msg := new(dns.Msg)
@@ -67,7 +73,7 @@ func (v *PublicVerifier) VerifyRecord(ctx context.Context, record entity.DnsReco
 		if !checkValue {
 			return true, ""
 		}
-		if answerMatches(reply.Answer, record.Value) {
+		if answerMatches(reply.Answer, record.Type, record.Value) {
 			return true, ""
 		}
 		lastDetail = fmt.Sprintf("%s: published value does not match the desired one", resolver)
@@ -77,11 +83,7 @@ func (v *PublicVerifier) VerifyRecord(ctx context.Context, record entity.DnsReco
 }
 
 // answerMatches compares the resolver's answer against the desired value.
-// Comparison is on the record's own presentation form with the owner name and
-// TTL stripped, which is what makes it work uniformly across record types.
-func answerMatches(answers []dns.RR, want string) bool {
-	want = normalizeRdata(want)
-
+func answerMatches(answers []dns.RR, recordType, want string) bool {
 	for _, rr := range answers {
 		// String() renders "<name>\t<ttl>\t<class>\t<type>\t<rdata>"; the
 		// rdata is everything after the fourth tab.
@@ -89,18 +91,98 @@ func answerMatches(answers []dns.RR, want string) bool {
 		if len(parts) < 5 {
 			continue
 		}
-		if normalizeRdata(parts[4]) == want {
+		if answerMatchesValue(recordType, parts[4], want) {
 			return true
 		}
 	}
 	return false
 }
 
-// normalizeRdata removes the differences that do not change meaning: quoting
-// of TXT strings, trailing dots on names, case, and repeated whitespace.
-func normalizeRdata(value string) string {
-	value = strings.ReplaceAll(value, `"`, "")
+// answerMatchesValue decides whether one published rdata means the same thing
+// as the value that was asked for.
+//
+// The comparison has to be per type. A single normalisation for everything is
+// what made the console report records as missing while they were published
+// and correct: an MX answer carries a priority the desired value does not, and
+// a TXT longer than 255 bytes arrives as several quoted strings that belong
+// end to end rather than separated.
+func answerMatchesValue(recordType, published, want string) bool {
+	switch strings.ToUpper(recordType) {
+	case "MX":
+		// The spec keeps the priority in its own field, so the desired value
+		// is the host alone. Comparing it against "10 mail.example.test."
+		// said the MX of a domain receiving mail daily did not exist.
+		return normalizeName(mxHost(published)) == normalizeName(want)
+	case "TXT", "SPF":
+		return joinTxtStrings(published) == joinTxtStrings(want)
+	case "CNAME", "NS", "PTR":
+		return normalizeName(published) == normalizeName(want)
+	default:
+		return normalizeName(published) == normalizeName(want)
+	}
+}
+
+// mxHost drops the preference number an MX answer carries.
+func mxHost(rdata string) string {
+	fields := strings.Fields(strings.TrimSpace(rdata))
+	if len(fields) >= 2 {
+		return fields[len(fields)-1]
+	}
+	return strings.TrimSpace(rdata)
+}
+
+// normalizeName removes the differences that do not change what a name means.
+func normalizeName(value string) string {
 	value = strings.Join(strings.Fields(value), " ")
+	value = strings.Trim(value, `"`)
 	value = strings.TrimSuffix(value, ".")
-	return strings.ToLower(value)
+	return strings.ToLower(strings.TrimSpace(value))
+}
+
+// joinTxtStrings puts a TXT value back together.
+//
+// A value over 255 bytes is published as several strings, and a resolver
+// renders them as `"first" "second"`. They are one value end to end: joining
+// them with a space inserted one into the middle of a DKIM public key, so
+// every RSA DKIM record was reported as missing. Spaces inside a single
+// string are meaningful and survive.
+func joinTxtStrings(value string) string {
+	var out strings.Builder
+	inQuote := false
+	quoted := false
+
+	for i := 0; i < len(value); i++ {
+		c := value[i]
+		switch {
+		case c == '\\' && i+1 < len(value) && inQuote:
+			i++
+			out.WriteByte(value[i])
+		case c == '"':
+			inQuote = !inQuote
+			quoted = true
+		case inQuote:
+			out.WriteByte(c)
+		case c == ' ' || c == '\t':
+			// Whitespace between strings is the rendering, not the value.
+			if !quoted {
+				out.WriteByte(c)
+			}
+		default:
+			out.WriteByte(c)
+		}
+	}
+	return strings.TrimSpace(out.String())
+}
+
+// queryTypeFor is the record type to actually ask a resolver about.
+//
+// A proxied CNAME is answered as A by the provider, so asking for the CNAME
+// returns nothing at all - which is how a record that was published and
+// serving traffic came back reported as missing.
+func queryTypeFor(recordType string, proxied bool) string {
+	upper := strings.ToUpper(recordType)
+	if proxied && upper == "CNAME" {
+		return "A"
+	}
+	return upper
 }

services/protocols/internal/infrastructure/netdns/public_verifier_match_test.go

@@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
+package netdns
+
+import "testing"
+
+// Comparing a desired record against what a resolver actually answers.
+//
+// Every case here comes from a real zone where the console reported a record
+// as missing while it was published and correct. Telling an operator that a
+// record they can see in their DNS does not exist is worse than saying
+// nothing: they go looking for a problem that is not there.
+
+func TestMxIgnoresThePriorityAndTrailingDot(t *testing.T) {
+	// The spec carries the host in Value and the priority in its own field, so
+	// the desired value is the host alone. A resolver answers "10 mail.x." -
+	// comparing the two as strings said the MX of a domain that receives mail
+	// every day did not exist.
+	if !answerMatchesValue("MX", "10 mail.lucasrguerra.dev.br.", "mail.lucasrguerra.dev.br") {
+		t.Error("a published MX was reported as missing")
+	}
+	if !answerMatchesValue("MX", "20 mail.lucasrguerra.dev.br.", "mail.lucasrguerra.dev.br") {
+		t.Error("the priority should not decide whether the host matches")
+	}
+	// A different host is still a real difference.
+	if answerMatchesValue("MX", "10 outro.example.test.", "mail.lucasrguerra.dev.br") {
+		t.Error("a different mail host was accepted")
+	}
+}
+
+// A TXT value longer than 255 bytes is published as several strings, and a
+// resolver renders them quoted and separated. Joining them with a space - which
+// is what stripping the quotes and collapsing whitespace did - inserted a space
+// into the middle of a DKIM public key, so every RSA DKIM record on the zone
+// was reported as missing.
+func TestLongTxtIsJoinedWithoutASeparator(t *testing.T) {
+	published := `"v=DKIM1; k=rsa; p=AAAA" "BBBB"`
+	if !answerMatchesValue("TXT", published, "v=DKIM1; k=rsa; p=AAAABBBB") {
+		t.Error("a split TXT record was reported as missing")
+	}
+}
+
+func TestShortTxtStillMatches(t *testing.T) {
+	if !answerMatchesValue("TXT", `"v=spf1 mx -all"`, "v=spf1 mx -all") {
+		t.Error("a single-string TXT was reported as missing")
+	}
+}
+
+// The spaces inside a policy string are meaningful and must survive.
+func TestTxtKeepsItsOwnSpaces(t *testing.T) {
+	if !answerMatchesValue("TXT", `"v=spf1 include:_spf.example.test -all"`,
+		"v=spf1 include:_spf.example.test -all") {
+		t.Error("a TXT with real spaces stopped matching")
+	}
+	if answerMatchesValue("TXT", `"v=spf1 mx -all"`, "v=spf1 mx ~all") {
+		t.Error("a genuinely different policy was accepted")
+	}
+}
+
+func TestCnameIgnoresTheTrailingDot(t *testing.T) {
+	if !answerMatchesValue("CNAME", "mail.lucasrguerra.dev.br.", "mail.lucasrguerra.dev.br") {
+		t.Error("a published CNAME was reported as missing")
+	}
+}
+
+func TestCaseDoesNotDecide(t *testing.T) {
+	if !answerMatchesValue("CNAME", "MAIL.LUCASRGUERRA.DEV.BR.", "mail.lucasrguerra.dev.br") {
+		t.Error("a name in another case was reported as missing")
+	}
+}
+
+func TestAValueIsCompared(t *testing.T) {
+	if !answerMatchesValue("A", "203.0.113.10", "203.0.113.10") {
+		t.Error("a matching A record was reported as missing")
+	}
+	if answerMatchesValue("A", "203.0.113.99", "203.0.113.10") {
+		t.Error("a different address was accepted")
+	}
+}
+
+// A record behind the provider's proxy is not published as the type it was
+// created as: a proxied CNAME answers A, carrying the proxy's own addresses.
+// Asking for the CNAME therefore comes back empty, and the console reported
+// the record as missing while it was there and serving traffic.
+func TestProxiedCnameIsQueriedAsTheTypeTheProxyAnswers(t *testing.T) {
+	proxied := queryTypeFor("CNAME", true)
+	if proxied != "A" {
+		t.Errorf("a proxied CNAME is queried as %s; the proxy answers A", proxied)
+	}
+	// Without the proxy it is still a CNAME question.
+	if plain := queryTypeFor("CNAME", false); plain != "CNAME" {
+		t.Errorf("an ordinary CNAME is queried as %s", plain)
+	}
+	// Other types are unaffected: a proxied A is still an A.
+	if a := queryTypeFor("A", true); a != "A" {
+		t.Errorf("a proxied A is queried as %s", a)
+	}
+}

services/webmail/src/app/(admin)/admin/layout.tsx

@@ -105,7 +105,10 @@ export default function AdminLayout({ children }: { children: React.ReactNode })
             {initialsFor(account?.email)}
           </span>
           <span className="min-w-0 flex-1">
-            <span className="block break-words text-[12.5px] leading-tight">
+            <span
+              className="block truncate text-[12.5px] leading-tight"
+              title={account?.email ?? undefined}
+            >
               {account?.email ?? t("common.loading")}
             </span>
             <span className="mt-0.5 flex items-center gap-1 text-[10.5px] text-slate-400">
@@ -154,7 +157,7 @@ export default function AdminLayout({ children }: { children: React.ReactNode })
       </div>
 
       {/* Desktop rail */}
-      <aside className="hidden w-[244px] flex-none flex-col bg-dark-rail shadow-[inset_-1px_0_0_0_rgba(233,233,237,0.09)] md:flex">
+      <aside className="hidden w-[244px] flex-none flex-col bg-dark-rail xl:w-[268px] shadow-[inset_-1px_0_0_0_rgba(233,233,237,0.09)] md:flex">
         {SidebarContent}
       </aside>
 

services/webmail/src/interface-integrity.test.ts

@@ -198,3 +198,25 @@ describe("API proxy routing", () => {
     expect(proxy).toContain("return AUTH_SERVICE_URL");
   });
 });
+
+describe("the admin rail has the fixes the webmail rail got", () => {
+  const ADMIN_LAYOUT = "src/app/(admin)/admin/layout.tsx";
+
+  // The same defect, in the other surface: break-words split the address
+  // mid-domain and left a lone "br" on its own line.
+  it("truncates the account address instead of breaking it apart", () => {
+    const layout = code(ADMIN_LAYOUT);
+    expect(layout).not.toMatch(/break-words[^"]*>\s*\{?\s*(account|session)?\??\.?email/);
+    expect(layout).toMatch(/truncate[\s\S]{0,200}email/);
+  });
+
+  // A rail pinned at 244px is what made the address and the surface switch
+  // too tight to fit in the first place.
+  it("gives the rail room on a wide screen", () => {
+    expect(code(ADMIN_LAYOUT)).toMatch(/xl:w-\[\d+px\]/);
+  });
+
+  it("keeps the full address reachable in the tooltip", () => {
+    expect(code(ADMIN_LAYOUT)).toMatch(/title=\{[^}]*email/);
+  });
+});