- Added `MoveToTrash` method in `WebmailRepository` to move messages to the Trash folder instead of deleting them permanently.
- Introduced `handleDelete` method in `mailAPI` to handle message deletion requests from the client.
- Updated router to include a new route for message deletion.
- Enhanced the compose page to manage draft integrity, ensuring drafts are correctly associated with sent messages.
- Implemented UI changes to allow users to delete messages from the mail folder view.
- Added tests to verify the correct behavior of message deletion and draft handling.
- Updated database migration scripts to reconcile folder counters and ensure accurate unread counts.
- Added tests for TLS-RPT report parsing and webmail repository functionalities.
The autosave I had just added appended a new message on every debounce, so a
few minutes of typing would have left the Drafts folder holding a dozen copies
of the same unfinished mail. Caught before deploying.
The composer now returns the stored UID and sends it back as replace_uid on
the next save; the use case expunges the superseded draft, but only after the
replacement has committed, so a failure leaves the older draft in place rather
than losing both. Expunge is a soft delete matching the expunged_at column the
schema already uses, and it locates the message by mailbox as well as UID so a
caller cannot delete someone else's mail by guessing a number.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The mail screens had no backend at all: they rendered a hardcoded array,
and the storage service that ADR-001 assigned this to is still a health
stub. The API lands here instead, because the folder, UID, MODSEQ, flag
and blob logic already exists and is tested in this service for IMAP.
Reimplementing it in TypeScript would mean two implementations of the
same semantics and two chances to disagree about what a UID means.
Reads use a projected read model rather than hydrated aggregates, which
is the CQRS exception PLAN.md section 2 carves out for webmail queries.
Every query is scoped to the mailbox resolved from the verified session,
never to an identifier taken from the request, so one account cannot read
another's mail by guessing a UID - covered by a test that tries exactly
that and expects 404.
Sending reuses ProcessOutboundEmailUseCase, so mail written in the browser
gets the same treatment as mail submitted over 587: send limits, DKIM
signing, and the durable queue. The From address comes from the session
and never from the request body; letting the body choose it is how a
webmail becomes a relay for spoofed mail.
MIME is parsed server-side because this service already depends on a MIME
library. A message that will not parse still returns its raw text - an
unreadable message beats an inbox that refuses to open one.
Marking a message read updates the flag and the folder counter in one
transaction, and only on a real transition, so re-opening a message cannot
drive unread_count negative.
Verified against the running stack: a message delivered over port 25
appears in the list with its decoded subject and sender, opens, marks
itself read, is found by search, and a message composed in the webmail
reaches outbound_jobs with the session's address as the envelope sender.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Lucas Rayan